Post by NZBC on Nov 1, 2014 13:29:06 GMT 12
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19181023.2.24&srpos=12&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19161214.2.2.4&srpos=9&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
A charge of creating a nuisance was preferred against a Chinese fruiterer, Leong Ting, at the New Plymouth Magistrate's Court yesterday, by Inspector Day. The defendant had allowed refuse such as discarded fruit and vegetables to accumulate in a right-ofway near his shop, and the Inspector remarked that the spot was just near the ventilators of a theatre; on one occasion the smell from the refuse could be detected inside the theatre. Mr. C. H. Weston, who appeared for defendant, said that proper receptacles would be provided for the refuse in future. The Magistrate, Mr. T. A. B. Bailey, in imposing a tine of ,-Cl, said future offenders would meet with heavier penalties, as such occurrences were a danger to the public health. Taranaki Daily News , 22 October 1920, Page 4
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19201022.2.24&srpos=10&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
The small amount of fourpence was involved in a charge of theft heard at the New Plymouth Magistrate's Court yesterday. The accused was a youth, named Jack Kearns, 18, years of age, and he pleaded guilty to a charge that on June 8 .he stole two oranges, valued at fouipence, the property of Leong Ting, a Chinese fuuiterer. Sub-Inspector Hutton said that at 9.30 on the night in question, the youth had gone into the Chinaman's shop and picked up two oranges which he put in his pocket.. The Chinaman then came out, and the lad bought sixpence worth of apples, which he paid for. The Chinamen then accused the lad of stealing the oranges, and he handed one back, retaining the other. After some bartering between the two, the polie3 was called in, and the accused admitted taking the oranges. The Magistrate remarked that although the amount involved was very Bmall, the accused had no right to take what didn't belong to him, and a theft had been committed. Ho considered the case was serious owing to the principle of the thing, but as the lad bore an excellent character, he would not enter a conviction, and so brand him a.} a thief. At the same time he warned the accused that the stealing of the Chinaman's oranges was just as serious a? stealing something bigger. Taranaki Daily News , 18 June 1920, Page 4 paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19200618.2.17&srpos=11&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19161214.2.2.4&srpos=9&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
A charge of creating a nuisance was preferred against a Chinese fruiterer, Leong Ting, at the New Plymouth Magistrate's Court yesterday, by Inspector Day. The defendant had allowed refuse such as discarded fruit and vegetables to accumulate in a right-ofway near his shop, and the Inspector remarked that the spot was just near the ventilators of a theatre; on one occasion the smell from the refuse could be detected inside the theatre. Mr. C. H. Weston, who appeared for defendant, said that proper receptacles would be provided for the refuse in future. The Magistrate, Mr. T. A. B. Bailey, in imposing a tine of ,-Cl, said future offenders would meet with heavier penalties, as such occurrences were a danger to the public health. Taranaki Daily News , 22 October 1920, Page 4
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19201022.2.24&srpos=10&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--
The small amount of fourpence was involved in a charge of theft heard at the New Plymouth Magistrate's Court yesterday. The accused was a youth, named Jack Kearns, 18, years of age, and he pleaded guilty to a charge that on June 8 .he stole two oranges, valued at fouipence, the property of Leong Ting, a Chinese fuuiterer. Sub-Inspector Hutton said that at 9.30 on the night in question, the youth had gone into the Chinaman's shop and picked up two oranges which he put in his pocket.. The Chinaman then came out, and the lad bought sixpence worth of apples, which he paid for. The Chinamen then accused the lad of stealing the oranges, and he handed one back, retaining the other. After some bartering between the two, the polie3 was called in, and the accused admitted taking the oranges. The Magistrate remarked that although the amount involved was very Bmall, the accused had no right to take what didn't belong to him, and a theft had been committed. Ho considered the case was serious owing to the principle of the thing, but as the lad bore an excellent character, he would not enter a conviction, and so brand him a.} a thief. At the same time he warned the accused that the stealing of the Chinaman's oranges was just as serious a? stealing something bigger. Taranaki Daily News , 18 June 1920, Page 4 paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&cl=search&d=TDN19200618.2.17&srpos=11&e=-------100--1----0leong+waitara--